Alice E. Loper

12 papers receiving 426 citations

Peers

Alice E. Loper
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Pharmaceutical Science 266
  • Analytical Chemistry 38
  • Neurology 49
  • Biomaterials 44
  • Pharmacology 27
Replace Diane Tang‐Liu with:
Diane Tang‐Liu Ireland
Karen Engle United States
Nobuyuki Kitamori Japan
Sukhbir S. Chrai United States
Kung‐I Feng United States
Suzanne M. Caliph Australia
M. Guyot France
Kazuo Noda Japan
Jennifer L. H. Johnson United States
Wei-San Pan China
Alice E. Loper relative to Diane Tang‐Liu Ireland Diane Tang‐Liu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.6×
Diane Tang‐Liu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Alice E. Loper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Alice E. Loper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alice E. Loper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alice E. Loper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Alice E. Loper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alice E. Loper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alice E. Loper. The network helps show where Alice E. Loper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Alice E. Loper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Alice E. Loper Line = papers co-authored together Alice E. Loper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 2004242
2 199644
3 198541
4 198928
5 198925
6 199525
7 198720
8 199818
9 199911
10
Correlation of in vivo bioavailability of erythromycin stearate tablets with in vitro tests.
19805
11
Solvent system effects on drug absorption.
19794
12 19824
13 19960

About Alice E. Loper

Alice E. Loper is a scholar working on Pharmaceutical Science, Molecular Biology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Oncology and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, having authored 13 papers that have together received 467 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems (3 papers), Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals (2 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (2 papers), Pharmaceutical studies and practices (2 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Assays (1 paper), Heat shock proteins research (1 paper), Antifungal resistance and susceptibility (1 paper) and Gastrointestinal motility and disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmaceutical Science (266 citations), Analytical Chemistry (38 citations), Neurology (49 citations), Biomaterials (44 citations) and Pharmacology (27 citations). Alice E. Loper has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Mexico and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Linda Novak, Gloria Y. Kwei, Lisa Hettrick, Yunhui Wu, David Storey, Suhas Shelukar, Karen Thompson, Cindy Chen, Ray Higgins and M Hichens. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Pharmaceutics, Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, Experimental Dermatology and Neurology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact