Alice Baniel

29 papers receiving 601 citations

Peers

Alice Baniel
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Developmental Biology 44
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 224
  • Social Psychology 211
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 101
  • Biological Psychiatry 11
Replace Mareike C. Janiak with:
Mareike C. Janiak United States
Niki H. Learn United States
Kirsty J. MacLeod United States
Josefina Zidar Sweden
Lydia K. Greene United States
Toshifumi Udono Japan
Amy Lu United States
Alexandra B. Bentz United States
Emmanuel O. Wango Kenya
Bethanne Zelano United States
Alice Baniel relative to Mareike C. Janiak United States Mareike C. Janiak's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×11×
Mareike C. Janiak · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Alice Baniel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Alice Baniel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alice Baniel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alice Baniel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Alice Baniel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alice Baniel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alice Baniel. The network helps show where Alice Baniel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Alice Baniel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Alice Baniel Line = papers co-authored together Alice Baniel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2021171
2 201352
3 201346
4 201436
5 201734
6 201632
7 201831
8 201224
9 202222
10 202021
11 201821
12 202218
13 202214
14 202113
15 202012
16 20228
17 20228
18 20247
19 20226
20 20215

About Alice Baniel

Alice Baniel is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Developmental Biology and Ecology, having authored 32 papers that have together received 606 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Primate Behavior and Ecology (17 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (12 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (10 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (5 papers), Gut microbiota and health (5 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (4 papers), Plant and animal studies (3 papers) and Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Biology (44 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (224 citations), Social Psychology (211 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (101 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (11 citations). Alice Baniel has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Élise Huchard, Guy Cowlishaw, Amy Lu, Noah Snyder‐Mackler, Lauren A. Petrullo, Ken Cheng, Antoine Wystrach, Sebastian Schwarz, Sierra N. Sams and Jacinta C. Beehner. Their work appears in journals such as Animal Behaviour, Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, Current Biology, iScience and Royal Society Open Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact