Ali Riaz

1.0k citations
59 papers · 442 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Ali Riaz

54 papers receiving 393 citations

Peers

Ali Riaz
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
  • Political Science and International Relations 222
  • Sociology and Political Science 177
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 36
  • Pollution 23
  • Communication 12
Replace Clarisa Pérez‐Armendáriz with:
Clarisa Pérez‐Armendáriz United States
Jasmine Lorenzini Switzerland
Mine Eder Türkiye
Sofya Aptekar United States
Wenkai Sun China
Alan Sillitoe
Nicola Thompson United Kingdom
Kathleen Rodgers Canada
Sally Roever United States
Ximing Wu United States
Ali Riaz relative to Clarisa Pérez‐Armendáriz United States Clarisa Pérez‐Armendáriz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.7×
Clarisa Pérez‐Armendáriz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ali Riaz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ali Riaz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ali Riaz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ali Riaz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ali Riaz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ali Riaz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ali Riaz. The network helps show where Ali Riaz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ali Riaz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ali Riaz Line = papers co-authored together Ali Riaz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 59 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202059
2 201928
3 200326
4 202023
5 200718
6 200517
7 199917
8 202117
9 201016
10 201414
11 201814
12 200513
13 201411
14 202211
15 200610
16 201910
17 19979
18 20119
19
Who are the Bangladeshi ‘Islamist Militants’?
20167
20 20077

About Ali Riaz

Ali Riaz is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Education, General Health Professions and Anthropology, having authored 59 papers that have together received 442 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bangladesh Politics, Society, and Development (28 papers), Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East (11 papers), Asian Studies and History (8 papers), Political Conflict and Governance (5 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (3 papers), Education and Islamic Studies (3 papers), Religious Education and Schools (2 papers) and South Asian Studies and Conflicts (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (222 citations), Sociology and Political Science (177 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (36 citations), Pollution (23 citations) and Communication (12 citations). Ali Riaz has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Pakistan and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Muhammad Rizwan, Saddam Hussain, Khaliq Ur Rahman, Muhammad Adnan, Muhammad Nazir Uddin, Mukhtar Alam, Kasi Marimuthu, Muhammad Khisroon, Muhammad Muhammad and Md. Sohel Rana. Their work appears in journals such as Comparative Studies of South Asia Africa and the Middle East, Democratization, Asian Survey, BioMed Research International and Europhysics Letters (EPL).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact