Alexandra Keyes

624 citations
16 papers · 506 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Alexandra Keyes

14 papers receiving 494 citations

Peers

Alexandra Keyes
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
  • Clinical Psychology 409
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 37
  • Applied Psychology 10
  • Pharmacology 25
  • Neurology 9
Replace Michael Hase with:
Michael Hase Germany
Lee Tibi Israel
Marasha de Jong United States
Margaret Jaffer United States
Narei Hong South Korea
J. Craig Nelson United States
Rebecca S. Firth United States
Blanche Freund United States
Rizwan Ahmed United States
Vasco Nogueira Portugal
Alexandra Keyes relative to Michael Hase Germany Michael Hase's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×
Michael Hase · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Alexandra Keyes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Alexandra Keyes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alexandra Keyes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alexandra Keyes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Alexandra Keyes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alexandra Keyes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alexandra Keyes. The network helps show where Alexandra Keyes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Alexandra Keyes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Alexandra Keyes Line = papers co-authored together Alexandra Keyes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 2015163
2 201773
3 201662
4 201456
5 201628
6 201726
7 201625
8 201724
9 201918
10 201613
11 201613
12 20203
13
A randomised controlled multicentre trial comparing the Maudsley Model of Anorexia Nervosa Treatment for Adults with specialist supportive clinical management in outpatients with broad anorexia nervosa (work package 2a)
20171
14
Atypical Eating Disorders and Specific Phobia of Vomiting: Clinical Presentation and Treatment Approaches
20171
15 20160
16 20210

About Alexandra Keyes

Alexandra Keyes is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Pharmacology, Nuclear Energy and Engineering and Waste Management and Disposal, having authored 16 papers that have together received 506 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Eating Disorders and Behaviors (12 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (3 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (1 paper), Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (1 paper) and Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (409 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (37 citations), Applied Psychology (10 citations), Pharmacology (25 citations) and Neurology (9 citations). Alexandra Keyes has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Helen R. Gilpin, Ulrike H Schmidt, Daniel R. Stahl, Lance M. McCracken, Iain C. Campbell, David M. Veale, C O'Hara, Savani Bartholdy, Peter M. Webster and Benita Middleton. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Eating Disorders, PLoS ONE, Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, Journal of Pain and Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact