Alexander Pohl

881 citations
57 papers · 597 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Alexander Pohl

46 papers receiving 535 citations

Peers

Alexander Pohl
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Clinical Psychology 294
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 49
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 86
  • Computer Science Applications 30
  • Strategy and Management 62
Replace Michał Tomasz Tomczak with:
Michał Tomasz Tomczak Poland
Marios A. Pappas Greece
María Luisa Sanz de Acedo Lizárraga Spain
Yannis Papagerasimou Greece
Miguel Santana France
Russell S. Beauregard United States
Anya Skatova United Kingdom
María Teresa Sanz de Acedo Baquedano Spain
Andrew B. Speer United States
Kelly A. McGuire United States
Alexander Pohl relative to Michał Tomasz Tomczak Poland Michał Tomasz Tomczak's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×20×40×52×
Michał Tomasz Tomczak · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Alexander Pohl

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Alexander Pohl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alexander Pohl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alexander Pohl more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Alexander Pohl

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alexander Pohl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alexander Pohl. The network helps show where Alexander Pohl may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Alexander Pohl, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Alexander Pohl Line = papers co-authored together Alexander Pohl links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201665
2 201858
3 201747
4 201740
5 199638
6 201937
7 201828
8 201123
9 201520
10 201919
11 201914
12 201112
13 201312
14 201712
15 201112
16 200711
17 201211
18 201511
19 201810
20 201910

About Alexander Pohl

Alexander Pohl is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Management of Technology and Innovation, Clinical Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Education, having authored 57 papers that have together received 597 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Corporate Governance and Management (12 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (10 papers), Digital Innovation in Industries (9 papers), Online and Blended Learning (8 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (6 papers), Innovative Teaching Methods (5 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (5 papers) and Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (294 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (49 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (86 citations), Computer Science Applications (30 citations) and Strategy and Management (62 citations). Alexander Pohl has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include François Bry, Jorge Ponseti, Hannah Gerwinn, Martin Walter, Boris Schiffer, Till Amelung, Claudia Massau, Henrik Walter, Sebastian Mohnke and Klaus Michael Beier. Their work appears in journals such as Translational Psychiatry, The Journal of Sex Research, Journal of Psychiatric Research, Human Brain Mapping and European Management Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact