Alexa Pohl

976 citations
9 papers · 632 · h-index 8

Impact in

    • Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
    • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
    • Family and Disability Support Research
    • Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders

Papers in

Alexa Pohl

9 papers receiving 622 citations

Peers

Alexa Pohl
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 424
  • Clinical Psychology 160
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 103
  • Genetics 144
  • Reproductive Medicine 34
Replace Eszter Székely with:
Eszter Székely Canada
Jennifer L. Sokoloff United States
Jonna Eriksson Sweden
Fop Verheij Netherlands
Rhona McGurk United Kingdom
Jo‐Anne K. Finegan Canada
Rachael A. Muscatello United States
Mats Cederlund Sweden
D.M. Hougaard Denmark
Simon Kyaga Sweden
Alexa Pohl relative to Eszter Székely Canada Eszter Székely's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Eszter Székely · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Alexa Pohl

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Alexa Pohl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alexa Pohl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alexa Pohl more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Alexa Pohl

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alexa Pohl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alexa Pohl. The network helps show where Alexa Pohl may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Alexa Pohl, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Alexa Pohl Line = papers co-authored together Alexa Pohl links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 2019128
2 2014123
3 201698
4 202094
5 201878
6 201465
7 202121
8 201918
9 20207

About Alexa Pohl

Alexa Pohl is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Genetics, Education, Molecular Biology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 632 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (7 papers), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (5 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (4 papers), Congenital heart defects research (1 paper), Marine Ecology and Invasive Species (1 paper), Ovarian function and disorders (1 paper), Virology and Viral Diseases (1 paper) and Family and Disability Support Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (424 citations), Clinical Psychology (160 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (103 citations), Genetics (144 citations) and Reproductive Medicine (34 citations). Alexa Pohl has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Simon Baron‐Cohen, Bonnie Auyeung, Sarah Cassidy, Carrie Allison, Meng‐Chuan Lai, Alex Tsompanidis, Michael Lombardo, Morsi Abdallah, Amber Ruigrok and David M. Hougaard. Their work appears in journals such as Translational Psychiatry, Molecular Autism, Molecular Psychiatry, Autism and Aquatic Conservation Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact