Roger Daniel

21 papers receiving 452 citations

Peers

Roger Daniel
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
  • Small Animals 229
  • Parasitology 143
  • Animal Science and Zoology 118
  • Infectious Diseases 158
  • Microbiology 41
Replace Amely Campe with:
Amely Campe Germany
Qing‐Long Gong China
S. Sivajothi India
Andrea Di Provvido Italy
Gregg Hanzlicek United States
T. Mallon United Kingdom
F.E. Malone United Kingdom
Hong‐Bo Ni China
P. D. Juyal India
Sérgio Jorge Brazil
Roger Daniel relative to Amely Campe Germany Amely Campe's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Amely Campe · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Roger Daniel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Roger Daniel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Roger Daniel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Roger Daniel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Roger Daniel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Roger Daniel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Roger Daniel. The network helps show where Roger Daniel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Roger Daniel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Roger Daniel Line = papers co-authored together Roger Daniel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200582
2 200561
3 200955
4 201747
5 201243
6 200835
7 200632
8 200721
9 201616
10 199416
11 201812
12 201911
13 20198
14 20186
15
An Abattoir Survey to Determine the Population Profile in the Autumn of Fasciola hepatica in Condemned Bovine Livers from Ireland and the United Kingdom
20135
16 20164
17 20153
18 20203
19
Investigation of a possible role for Chlamydia in a new disease syndrome in dairy cattle.
19993
20 20161

About Roger Daniel

Roger Daniel is a scholar working on Infectious Diseases, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Small Animals, Animal Science and Zoology and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 22 papers that have together received 465 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Streptococcal Infections and Treatments (9 papers), Helminth infection and control (7 papers), Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus (6 papers), Coccidia and coccidiosis research (5 papers), Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management (3 papers), Parasite Biology and Host Interactions (3 papers), Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing (3 papers) and Vector-Borne Animal Diseases (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Small Animals (229 citations), Parasitology (143 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (118 citations), Infectious Diseases (158 citations) and Microbiology (41 citations). Roger Daniel has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Cambodia. Frequent co-authors include Diana Williams, G. C. Pritchard, Andrew Forbes, Peter J. Cripps, Timothy P. Jenkins, Rebecca Mearns, Victoria J. Chalker, Simon Rolfe, Jan van Dijk and T. Crawshaw. Their work appears in journals such as Veterinary Record, Veterinary Parasitology, Emerging infectious diseases, Clinical Infectious Diseases and International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact