Alex Pine
Impact in
- General Decision Sciences top 5%
- Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Neural dynamics and brain function
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Memory Processes and Influences
Papers in
-
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies 5
- Memory and Neural Mechanisms 3
- Neural dynamics and brain function 2
-
- Behavioral Health and Interventions 3
- Co-authors
- Yadin Dudai (3 shared papers)Jonathan P. Roiser (2 shared papers)Avi Mendelsohn (3 shared papers)Peter Bossaerts (1 shared paper)Raymond J. Dolan (1 shared paper)H. Valerie Curran (1 shared paper)Ben Seymour (1 shared paper)Karl Friston (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (1 paper)Frontiers in Psychology (1 paper)Neuron (1 paper)Frontiers in Neuroscience (1 paper)BMC Genomics (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- IsraelUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Alex Pine
9 papers receiving 413 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
- General Decision Sciences 94
- Cognitive Neuroscience 258
- Applied Psychology 29
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 55
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 57
Countries citing papers authored by Alex Pine
This map shows the geographic impact of Alex Pine's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alex Pine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alex Pine more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Alex Pine
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alex Pine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alex Pine. The network helps show where Alex Pine may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Alex Pine, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2009 | 172 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 74 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 46 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 35 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 29 | |
| 6 | 2009 | 29 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 18 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 15 | |
| 9 | 2014 | 7 |
About Alex Pine
Alex Pine is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Applied Psychology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, General Decision Sciences and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, having authored 9 papers that have together received 425 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (5 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (3 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (3 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (2 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (2 papers), Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (1 paper), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (1 paper) and Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (94 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (258 citations), Applied Psychology (29 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (55 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (57 citations). Alex Pine has collaborated with scholars based in Israel, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Yadin Dudai, Jonathan P. Roiser, Avi Mendelsohn, Peter Bossaerts, Raymond J. Dolan, H. Valerie Curran, Ben Seymour, Karl Friston, Aya Ben-Yakov and Noga Cohen. Their work appears in journals such as Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, Frontiers in Psychology, Neuron, Frontiers in Neuroscience and BMC Genomics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.