Alan Booth

1.1k citations
45 papers · 559 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Alan Booth

40 papers receiving 343 citations

Peers

Alan Booth
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 72
  • Economics and Econometrics 174
  • Political Science and International Relations 209
  • Computer Science Applications 23
  • Public Administration 20
Replace Alastair N. D. McAuley with:
Alastair N. D. McAuley United Kingdom
Andrew Seltzer United Kingdom
Élie Cohen France
Guy Alchon United States
Samuel Brittan United Kingdom
Richard Moody United States
Brian Goff United States
Guy Routh United Kingdom
Karen I. Vaughn United States
Dilmus D. James United States
Alan Booth relative to Alastair N. D. McAuley United Kingdom Alastair N. D. McAuley's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.6×
Alastair N. D. McAuley · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Alan Booth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Alan Booth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alan Booth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alan Booth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Alan Booth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alan Booth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alan Booth. The network helps show where Alan Booth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Alan Booth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Alan Booth Line = papers co-authored together Alan Booth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198755
2 200453
3 199743
4 198336
5 200430
6 198927
7 200025
8 200125
9 197724
10 200123
11 200322
12 199318
13 201918
14 198317
15 198016
16 199716
17 198613
18 200113
19 199012
20 19829

About Alan Booth

Alan Booth is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Economics and Econometrics, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Public Administration and History, having authored 45 papers that have together received 559 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political and Economic history of UK and US (21 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (14 papers), Economic Theory and Policy (6 papers), European Political History Analysis (5 papers), Labor Movements and Unions (4 papers), Irish and British Studies (2 papers), Historical Studies of British Isles (2 papers) and Social Policy and Reform Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (72 citations), Economics and Econometrics (174 citations), Political Science and International Relations (209 citations), Computer Science Applications (23 citations) and Public Administration (20 citations). Alan Booth has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Japan and United States. Frequent co-authors include John C. Rule, A. W. Bob Coats, Sean Glynn, W. R. Garside, Mairi Maclean, Charles Edward Harvey, Gareth Shaw, Joseph Melling, G. C. Peden and Roger Smith. Their work appears in journals such as The Economic History Review, The Historical Journal, Studies in Higher Education, Economy and Society and Oxford Economic Papers.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact