Ainslie E. Schultz

7 papers receiving 294 citations

Peers

Ainslie E. Schultz
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Health Informatics 17
  • Applied Psychology 32
  • Marketing 62
  • Safety Research 51
  • Management Information Systems 46
Replace Yuanyuan Gina Cui with:
Yuanyuan Gina Cui United States
Carina Benz Germany
David T. Newman United States
Seden Doğan Türkiye
Thi Viet Nga Ngo Vietnam
Magdalene Ng United Kingdom
Stanimira Taneva United Kingdom
Jen Rhymer United Kingdom
Ashish Viswanath Prakash India
Carlos M. Parra United States
Ainslie E. Schultz relative to Yuanyuan Gina Cui United States Yuanyuan Gina Cui's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.6×
Yuanyuan Gina Cui · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ainslie E. Schultz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ainslie E. Schultz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ainslie E. Schultz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ainslie E. Schultz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ainslie E. Schultz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ainslie E. Schultz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ainslie E. Schultz. The network helps show where Ainslie E. Schultz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Ainslie E. Schultz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ainslie E. Schultz Line = papers co-authored together Ainslie E. Schultz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 2018187
2 201794
3 202214
4 20218
5 20175
6 20225
7
Can a “Fresh Start” Help Consumers Achieve Their Goals?
20152
8 20251
9 20191

About Ainslie E. Schultz

Ainslie E. Schultz is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Safety Research, Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Information Systems and Management, having authored 9 papers that have together received 317 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Behavioral Health and Interventions (3 papers), Psychology of Social Influence (1 paper), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (1 paper), Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (1 paper), Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research (1 paper), Blockchain Technology Applications and Security (1 paper), Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation (1 paper) and Social and Intergroup Psychology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (17 citations), Applied Psychology (32 citations), Marketing (62 citations), Safety Research (51 citations) and Management Information Systems (46 citations). Ainslie E. Schultz has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Scott A. Wright, Yuliya Strizhakova, Robin A. Coulter, Linda L. Price, Kevin P. Newman, Jesper H. Nielsen and Cait Poynor Lamberton. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Business Research, Business Horizons, Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Business Ethics and Journal of Advertising Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact