Aine Ito

1.5k citations
18 papers · 533 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Aine Ito

16 papers receiving 521 citations

Peers

Aine Ito
Comparison fields: 5 of 31
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 323
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 471
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 225
  • Language and Linguistics 62
  • Artificial Intelligence 108
Replace Veronica Whitford with:
Veronica Whitford Canada
Stephani Foraker United States
David January United States
Kristen M. Tooley United States
Rachel S. Sussman United States
Clinton L. Johns United States
Angela Ku-Yuan Tzeng Italy
Benjamin Swets United States
Yoonhyoung Lee South Korea
Florian Hintz Netherlands
Aine Ito relative to Veronica Whitford Canada Veronica Whitford's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Veronica Whitford · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Aine Ito

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Aine Ito's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Aine Ito with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Aine Ito more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Aine Ito

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Aine Ito. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Aine Ito. The network helps show where Aine Ito may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Aine Ito, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Aine Ito Line = papers co-authored together Aine Ito links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 2015111
2 201785
3 201781
4 201657
5 202250
6 201639
7 201727
8 201926
9 202114
10 201912
11 202311
12 20248
13 20245
14 20174
15 20242
16 20241
17 20250
18 20240

About Aine Ito

Aine Ito is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Artificial Intelligence and Human-Computer Interaction, having authored 18 papers that have together received 533 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (16 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (8 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (6 papers), Categorization, perception, and language (6 papers), Text Readability and Simplification (4 papers), Second Language Acquisition and Learning (4 papers), Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology (3 papers) and Speech and dialogue systems (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (323 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (471 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (225 citations), Language and Linguistics (62 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (108 citations). Aine Ito has collaborated with scholars based in Singapore, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Martin J. Pickering, Martin Corley, Andrea E. Martin, Mante S. Nieuwland, Pia Knoeferle, E. Matthew Husband, Hiromu Sakai, Chiara Gambi, Yuki Hirose and Clara D. Martin. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Memory and Language, Bilingualism Language and Cognition, Language Cognition and Neuroscience, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology and Acta Psychologica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact