Aimee Pierce
Impact in
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
-
- Frailty in Older Adults
Papers in
-
- Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research 7
- Bipolar Disorder and Treatment 1
-
- Ethics in Clinical Research 3
- Co-authors
- Claudia H. Kawas (3 shared papers)Szofia Bullain (2 shared papers)Joshua D. Grill (5 shared papers)S. Ahmad Sajjadi (2 shared papers)Daniel L. Gillen (3 shared papers)Nasim Sheikh‐Bahaei (1 shared paper)Megan Witbracht (2 shared papers)Adrijana Gombosev (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Alzheimer s & Dementia (2 papers)Journal of Alzheimer s Disease (2 papers)Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders (1 paper)PLoS Medicine (1 paper)Alzheimer s Research & Therapy (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomBulgaria
In The Last Decade
Aimee Pierce
10 papers receiving 184 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Psychiatry and Mental health 94
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 12
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 4
- Biological Psychiatry 6
- Neurology 19
Countries citing papers authored by Aimee Pierce
This map shows the geographic impact of Aimee Pierce's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Aimee Pierce with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Aimee Pierce more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Aimee Pierce
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Aimee Pierce. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Aimee Pierce. The network helps show where Aimee Pierce may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Aimee Pierce, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 51 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 39 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 38 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 23 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 17 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 8 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 8 | 2025 | 2 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 2 | |
| 10 | 2023 | 1 |
About Aimee Pierce
Aimee Pierce is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Physiology, General Health Professions and Surgery, having authored 10 papers that have together received 184 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (7 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (3 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (3 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (2 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (1 paper), Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research (1 paper), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (1 paper) and Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (94 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (12 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (4 citations), Biological Psychiatry (6 citations) and Neurology (19 citations). Aimee Pierce has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Bulgaria. Frequent co-authors include Claudia H. Kawas, Szofia Bullain, Joshua D. Grill, S. Ahmad Sajjadi, Daniel L. Gillen, Nasim Sheikh‐Bahaei, Megan Witbracht, Adrijana Gombosev, Jeffrey M. Burns and Malcolm Dick. Their work appears in journals such as Alzheimer s & Dementia, Journal of Alzheimer s Disease, Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders, PLoS Medicine and Alzheimer s Research & Therapy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.