Adam Stanier

770 citations
35 papers · 493 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Adam Stanier

33 papers receiving 479 citations

Peers

Adam Stanier
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 419
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 258
  • Applied Mathematics 21
  • Computational Mechanics 30
  • Geophysics 19
Replace V. S. Lukin with:
V. S. Lukin United States
James Juno United States
E. L. Shi United States
C. L. Rousculp United States
E. Fenimore United States
Jonathan Jara-Almonte United States
Y. Kawazura Japan
Fabio Bacchini Belgium
И. Ф. Шайхисламов Russia
Shinji Koide Japan
Adam Stanier relative to V. S. Lukin United States V. S. Lukin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
V. S. Lukin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Adam Stanier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Adam Stanier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Adam Stanier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Adam Stanier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Adam Stanier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Adam Stanier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Adam Stanier. The network helps show where Adam Stanier may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Adam Stanier, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Adam Stanier Line = papers co-authored together Adam Stanier links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2022100
2 201841
3 201231
4 201529
5 201329
6 201525
7 201723
8 202320
9 201820
10 201917
11 201417
12 202114
13 201714
14 202113
15 201512
16 201611
17 202110
18 202010
19 20209
20 20227

About Adam Stanier

Adam Stanier is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Molecular Biology and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 35 papers that have together received 493 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (33 papers), Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (26 papers), Magnetic confinement fusion research (19 papers), Astro and Planetary Science (8 papers), Plasma Diagnostics and Applications (4 papers), Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies (3 papers), Magnetic Field Sensors Techniques (2 papers) and Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (419 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (258 citations), Applied Mathematics (21 citations), Computational Mechanics (30 citations) and Geophysics (19 citations). Adam Stanier has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Japan. Frequent co-authors include W. Daughton, A. Lê, Luis Chacòn, Jongsoo Yoo, Hantao Ji, Jonathan Ng, Jonathan Jara-Almonte, A. Bhattacharjee, Fan Guo and Ammar Hakim. Their work appears in journals such as Physics of Plasmas, Journal of Computational Physics, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, Geophysical Research Letters and Nature Reviews Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact