Adam Brook

768 citations
11 papers · 637 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Adam Brook

11 papers receiving 623 citations

Peers

Adam Brook
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Developmental Biology 31
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 72
  • Molecular Biology 437
  • Genetics 151
  • Rheumatology 64
Replace Wiltrud Coerdt with:
Wiltrud Coerdt Germany
Zhenghao Huo China
Peter J. Carolan United States
Jeffrey C. Murray United States
David J. Aughton United States
Hermine M. Pashayan United States
Rabah M. Shawky Egypt
Lílian Maria José Albano Brazil
Margaret Barrow United Kingdom
Philip M. Marden United States
Adam Brook relative to Wiltrud Coerdt Germany Wiltrud Coerdt's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Wiltrud Coerdt · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Adam Brook

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Adam Brook's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Adam Brook with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Adam Brook more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Adam Brook

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Adam Brook. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Adam Brook. The network helps show where Adam Brook may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Adam Brook, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Adam Brook Line = papers co-authored together Adam Brook links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 1997462
2 201583
3
The consequences of marijuana use on intrapersonal and interpersonal functioning in black and white adolescents.
198933
4 201726
5 201817
6 20126
7 20133
8 20193
9 20172
10 20251
11 20131

About Adam Brook

Adam Brook is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Rheumatology, Surgery and Molecular Biology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 637 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Birth, Development, and Health (4 papers), Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (4 papers), Gestational Diabetes Research and Management (3 papers), Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (2 papers), Pancreatic function and diabetes (1 paper), Diabetes Management and Research (1 paper), Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (1 paper) and Hemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Biology (31 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (72 citations), Molecular Biology (437 citations), Genetics (151 citations) and Rheumatology (64 citations). Adam Brook has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Sweden and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Matthias Hammerschmidt, Andrew P. McMahon, Andrew T. Hattersley, Beverley M. Shields, Chittaranjan S. Yajnik, Dattatray Bhat, Bridget Knight, Anita Hill, David W. Brook and Ann Scovell Gordon. Their work appears in journals such as Placenta, Diabetic Medicine, American Journal of Public Health, Trends in Genetics and The FASEB Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact