Ad Ridder

899 citations
48 papers · 541 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Ad Ridder

45 papers receiving 485 citations

Peers

Ad Ridder
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Management Information Systems 288
  • Management Science and Operations Research 142
  • Strategy and Management 113
  • Statistics and Probability 61
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 61
Replace Lotfi Tadj with:
Lotfi Tadj Saudi Arabia
Xianyi Wu China
Sharafali Moosa Singapore
Shaohui Zheng Hong Kong
M. J. M. Posner Canada
Chih-Chung Lo Taiwan
Eylem Tekin United States
Michael H. Veatch United States
Abraham Grosfeld‐Nir Israel
Ad Ridder relative to Lotfi Tadj Saudi Arabia Lotfi Tadj's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Lotfi Tadj · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ad Ridder

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ad Ridder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ad Ridder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ad Ridder more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ad Ridder

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ad Ridder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ad Ridder. The network helps show where Ad Ridder may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Ad Ridder, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ad Ridder Line = papers co-authored together Ad Ridder links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1996105
2 199574
3 199845
4 201331
5 198725
6 199924
7 200522
8 199520
9 200018
10 202017
11 200214
12 201013
13 200312
14 200810
15 20019
16 19889
17 20117
18 20107
19 19967
20 20057

About Ad Ridder

Ad Ridder is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Management Information Systems, Statistics and Probability, Finance and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 48 papers that have together received 541 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Probability and Risk Models (23 papers), Advanced Queuing Theory Analysis (15 papers), Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling (9 papers), Simulation Techniques and Applications (9 papers), Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management (5 papers), Markov Chains and Monte Carlo Methods (5 papers), Petri Nets in System Modeling (4 papers) and Supply Chain and Inventory Management (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Information Systems (288 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (142 citations), Strategy and Management (113 citations), Statistics and Probability (61 citations) and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (61 citations). Ad Ridder has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Israel and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Erwin van der Laan, Marc Salomon, Michel Mandjes, Rommert Dekker, Arie Hordijk, Jean Walrand, Reuven Y. Rubinstein, George Kesidis, Costas Courcoubetis and Richard Weber. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Probability, European Journal of Operational Research, Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences, Annals of Operations Research and Performance Evaluation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact