Achiel Van Peer

43 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Achiel Van Peer
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • Pharmacology 263
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 147
  • Pharmaceutical Science 118
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 199
  • Pharmacology 175
Replace Bart A. Ploeger with:
Bart A. Ploeger Netherlands
Kyoung Soo Lim South Korea
Keith K. H. Chan United States
Peter Zannikos United States
Eiji Yukawa Japan
L. P. Balant Switzerland
Alice I. Nichols United States
C B McAllister United States
William F. Ebling United States
Edward J. Randinitis United States
Achiel Van Peer relative to Bart A. Ploeger Netherlands Bart A. Ploeger's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Bart A. Ploeger · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Achiel Van Peer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Achiel Van Peer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Achiel Van Peer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Achiel Van Peer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Achiel Van Peer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Achiel Van Peer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Achiel Van Peer. The network helps show where Achiel Van Peer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Achiel Van Peer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Achiel Van Peer Line = papers co-authored together Achiel Van Peer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1993267
2 1995132
3 200164
4 201261
5 201453
6 201452
7 199846
8 200846
9 198443
10 200837
11 200936
12 198634
13 201534
14 200227
15 200327
16 199727
17 200925
18 201624
19 198621
20 201419

About Achiel Van Peer

Achiel Van Peer is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Organic Chemistry, Molecular Biology and Pharmaceutical Science, having authored 43 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (8 papers), Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (6 papers), Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (5 papers), Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems (4 papers), Chemical synthesis and alkaloids (4 papers), Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia (4 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (3 papers) and Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (263 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (147 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (118 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (199 citations) and Pharmacology (175 citations). Achiel Van Peer has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Robert Woestenborghs, J. Heykants, R. De Coster, Zbigniew Żylicz, Claire Mackie, Donald Heald, Nancy Van Osselaer, Frédéric Camu, Donald R. Stanski and Steven L. Shafer. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, Pharmaceutical Research, Clinical Pharmacokinetics, Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact