Aaron Smuts

1.0k citations
40 papers · 399 · h-index 11

Impact in

  • Philosophy top 1%
    • Philosophical Ethics and Theory
    • Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art
    • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
    • Free Will and Agency
    • Aesthetic Perception and Analysis

Papers in

    • Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art 11
    • Philosophical Ethics and Theory 8
    • Theology and Philosophy of Evil 5
    • Aesthetic Perception and Analysis 5
    • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment 4
    • Free Will and Agency 4

Aaron Smuts

34 papers receiving 326 citations

Peers

Aaron Smuts
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Philosophy 188
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 176
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 39
  • Social Psychology 130
  • Literature and Literary Theory 43
Replace Colin Radford with:
Colin Radford United Kingdom
Mark A. Wrathall United States
Jordynn Jack United States
Rudolf Bernet Belgium
Aaron Ridley United Kingdom
John Deigh United States
Harrison Hall United States
Thomas Szanto Denmark
Neil Van Leeuwen United States
John Hyman United Kingdom
Aaron Smuts relative to Colin Radford United Kingdom Colin Radford's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Colin Radford · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Aaron Smuts

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Aaron Smuts's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Aaron Smuts with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Aaron Smuts more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Aaron Smuts

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Aaron Smuts. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Aaron Smuts. The network helps show where Aaron Smuts may publish in the future.

No co-authors to show.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201351
2 201046
3 200937
4 200929
5
Are Video Games Art
200524
6 200824
7 200923
8
Do Moral Flaws Enhance Amusement
200919
9 201216
10
Helpless spectators : generating suspense in videogames and film
200413
11 200712
12 201710
13 201110
14 20149
15 20078
16 20097
17 20097
18 20147
19 20135
20 20135

About Aaron Smuts

Aaron Smuts is a scholar working on Philosophy, Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Visual Arts and Performing Arts, having authored 40 papers that have together received 399 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art (11 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (8 papers), Theology and Philosophy of Evil (5 papers), Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (5 papers), Digital Games and Media (4 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (4 papers), Free Will and Agency (4 papers) and Emotions and Moral Behavior (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (188 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (176 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (39 citations), Social Psychology (130 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (43 citations). Aaron Smuts has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, Philosophy Compass, Philosophy and literature, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice and Verbum et Ecclesia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact