Countries where authors publish in Verbum et Ecclesia
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Verbum et Ecclesia. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Verbum et Ecclesia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Verbum et Ecclesia more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Verbum et Ecclesia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Verbum et Ecclesia.
About Verbum et Ecclesia
The 1.4k papers published in Verbum et Ecclesia in the last decades have received a total of 4.3k indexed citations . Papers published in Verbum et Ecclesia usually cover Religious studies (895 papers), General Social Sciences (54 papers), Sociology and Political Science (705 papers), Philosophy (162 papers) and Development (46 papers) specifically the topics of Biblical Studies and Interpretation (564 papers), Christian Theology and Mission (491 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (400 papers), Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies (179 papers), African cultural and philosophical studies (140 papers), Contemporary Christian Leadership and Education (101 papers), Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies (69 papers) and Archaeology and Historical Studies (58 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Verbum et Ecclesia are Mookgo Solomon Kgatle, David Tuesday Adamo, Nelus Niemandt, Andries G. Van Aarde, Johan Buitendag, Anita Cloete, Johann Beukes, Kelebogile T. Resane, Marius Nel and Cas Wepener.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.