A. Mina

621 citations
7 papers · 408 · h-index 4

Impact in

Papers in

A. Mina

6 papers receiving 384 citations

Peers

A. Mina
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 113
  • Accounting 129
  • Strategy and Management 126
  • Economics and Econometrics 205
  • Business and International Management 14
Replace Mario Calderini with:
Mario Calderini Italy
Neus Palomeras Spain
Alfonso Gambardella Italy
Sadao Nagaoka Japan
Thomas Klueter Spain
Markus Simeth Denmark
Isabelle Kabla France
Sébastien Lechevalier France
Ram Ranganathan United States
Júlio Raffo Switzerland
A. Mina relative to Mario Calderini Italy Mario Calderini's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Mario Calderini · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by A. Mina

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A. Mina's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. Mina with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. Mina more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by A. Mina

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. Mina. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. Mina. The network helps show where A. Mina may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside A. Mina, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with A. Mina Line = papers co-authored together A. Mina links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
#Work
1 2007188
2 2013175
3 201236
4
How does successful innovation impact on the demand for skills and how do skills drive Innovation
20054
5
A Study on and concept development for Ireland's International Engagement in Science, Technology and Innovation [Report to the Advisory Council for Science, Technology and Innovation of the Republic of Ireland]
20082
6
Progress in Medicine: the structure and evolution of know-how for the treatment of glaucoma
20052
7 20211

About A. Mina

A. Mina is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Molecular Biology, Urban Studies and Social Psychology, having authored 7 papers that have together received 408 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Facilities and Workplace Management (1 paper), scientometrics and bibliometrics research (1 paper), Academic Publishing and Open Access (1 paper), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (1 paper), Private Equity and Venture Capital (1 paper), Cultural Industries and Urban Development (1 paper), Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis (1 paper) and Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Management of Technology and Innovation (113 citations), Accounting (129 citations), Strategy and Management (126 citations), Economics and Econometrics (205 citations) and Business and International Management (14 citations). A. Mina has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Ukraine. Frequent co-authors include Henry Lahr, Alan Hughes, J. S. Metcalfe, Gindo Tampubolon, Ronnie Ramlogan, Bruce Tether, Qian Cher Li, Davide Consoli, Andrew McMeekin and Diana Gagliardi. Their work appears in journals such as Research Policy, Journal of Economic Geography, Industrial and Corporate Change, Psicothema and American Journal of Clinical Pathology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact