A. Gothot

847 citations
28 papers · 688 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

A. Gothot

28 papers receiving 657 citations

Peers

A. Gothot
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Urology 72
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 84
  • Hematology 95
  • Immunology 180
  • Genetics 80
Replace Shlomo Kotev‐Emeth with:
Shlomo Kotev‐Emeth Israel
O Huber-Bruning Netherlands
Hanna Mocharla United States
Christiane Schüler Austria
Py Palmqvist Sweden
J.F. Van Offel Belgium
Chen Dong China
Laura Burgess Canada
Zahra Zakeri Iran
A. Gothot relative to Shlomo Kotev‐Emeth Israel Shlomo Kotev‐Emeth's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.5×
Shlomo Kotev‐Emeth · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by A. Gothot

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A. Gothot's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. Gothot with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. Gothot more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by A. Gothot

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. Gothot. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. Gothot. The network helps show where A. Gothot may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside A. Gothot, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with A. Gothot Line = papers co-authored together A. Gothot links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000204
2 198965
3 200965
4 200960
5 200743
6 201535
7 201034
8 199232
9 200931
10 200827
11 201415
12 200915
13 201912
14 20159
15 19968
16 20037
17
RISK OF RED BLOOD CELL ALLOIMMUNISATION IN RWANDA: ASSESSMENT OF PRETRANSFUSION CROSSMATCH TECHNIQUES USED IN DISTRICT HOSPITALS.
20135
18 20133
19 20113
20 20123

About A. Gothot

A. Gothot is a scholar working on Surgery, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Hematology, Cell Biology and Immunology, having authored 28 papers that have together received 688 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Tendon Structure and Treatment (8 papers), Shoulder Injury and Treatment (5 papers), Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (4 papers), Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments (3 papers), Blood groups and transfusion (2 papers), Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment (2 papers), Sexual Differentiation and Disorders (2 papers) and Testicular diseases and treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urology (72 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (84 citations), Hematology (95 citations), Immunology (180 citations) and Genetics (80 citations). A. Gothot has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Germany and Luxembourg. Frequent co-authors include D Kutter, Gilles Vanderstocken, Yves Béguin, Jean‐François Kaux, Caroline Le Goff, David Dombrowicz, Georges Hennen, Jean Closset, Béatrice Sente and J.M. Crielaard. Their work appears in journals such as Haematologica, British Journal of Sports Medicine, Experimental Hematology, Oncogene and Acta Haematologica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact