А. Е. Донцов

57 papers receiving 837 citations

Peers

А. Е. Донцов
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Ophthalmology 337
  • Biochemistry 87
  • Insect Science 127
  • Cell Biology 150
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 140
Replace Н. Л. Сакина with:
Н. Л. Сакина Russia
K. Munz Switzerland
Barbara Pilas United States
Aimin Wei China
Enrico Bignetti Italy
Sang‐Soo Lee South Korea
Jaewon Shim South Korea
Rocío Gómez‐Pastor Spain
Prachi Srivastava India
Eva Ramon Spain
А. Е. Донцов relative to Н. Л. Сакина Russia Н. Л. Сакина's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
Н. Л. Сакина · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by А. Е. Донцов

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of А. Е. Донцов's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by А. Е. Донцов with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites А. Е. Донцов more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by А. Е. Донцов

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by А. Е. Донцов. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by А. Е. Донцов. The network helps show where А. Е. Донцов may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside А. Е. Донцов, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with А. Е. Донцов Line = papers co-authored together А. Е. Донцов links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 60 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1993168
2 198769
3 199969
4 201947
5 199246
6 197237
7 199932
8 200623
9 201722
10 200921
11 200618
12 202217
13 200215
14 201715
15 202014
16 202113
17 201813
18 202112
19 202211
20 201511

About А. Е. Донцов

А. Е. Донцов is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cell Biology, Ophthalmology, Organic Chemistry and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 60 papers that have together received 865 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Development and Disorders (17 papers), melanin and skin pigmentation (13 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (12 papers), Free Radicals and Antioxidants (9 papers), Insect Utilization and Effects (8 papers), Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress (7 papers), Dye analysis and toxicity (7 papers) and Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (337 citations), Biochemistry (87 citations), Insect Science (127 citations), Cell Biology (150 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (140 citations). А. Е. Донцов has collaborated with scholars based in Russia, Belarus and United States. Frequent co-authors include М. А. Оstrovsky, Н. Л. Сакина, Dimitri A. Svistunenko, John Jarvis-Evans, Randolph D. Glickman, Н. А. Ушакова, T. B. Feldman, M. A. Yakovleva, Tadeusz Wilczok and Krystyna Stępień. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Molecular Sciences, Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B Biology, Biophysical Reviews, Journal of Comparative Physiology B and Free Radical Biology and Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact