Zeitschrift für Phytotherapie

406 papers and 729 indexed citations i.

About

The 406 papers published in Zeitschrift für Phytotherapie in the last decades have received a total of 729 indexed citations. Papers published in Zeitschrift für Phytotherapie usually cover Complementary and alternative medicine (157 papers), Plant Science (93 papers) and Molecular Biology (73 papers) specifically the topics of Herbal Medicine Research Studies (65 papers), Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (58 papers) and Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (35 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Zeitschrift für Phytotherapie are Jens Bielenberg, Wilhelm Gaus, Karin Kraft, Matthias F. Melzig, Klaus Peter Latté, Volkmar Schulz, Christiane Staiger, Irmgard Merfort, Wilfried Dimpfel and Tankred Wegener.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Zeitschrift für Phytotherapie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Zeitschrift für Phytotherapie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Zeitschrift für Phytotherapie.

Countries where authors publish in Zeitschrift für Phytotherapie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Zeitschrift für Phytotherapie. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Zeitschrift für Phytotherapie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Zeitschrift für Phytotherapie more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025