World Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine

2.3k citations
420 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

Papers in

    • Traditional Chinese Medicine Analysis 69
    • Traditional Chinese Medicine Studies 63
    • Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies 38
    • Pharmacological Effects of Natural Compounds 54
    • Plant-based Medicinal Research 30

World Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine

355 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers

World Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine
Comparison fields: 5 of 164
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 364
  • Pharmacology 270
  • Biochemistry 58
  • Molecular Biology 650
  • Analytical Chemistry 91
Replace Yaoxue xuebao with:
Yaoxue xuebao China
American Journal of Pharmacology and Toxicology United States
Nano Biomedicine and Engineering China
Anti-Inflammatory & Anti-Allergy Agents in Medicinal Chemistry India
Pakistan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences Pakistan
MARMARA PHARMACEUTCAL JOURNAL Türkiye
Journal of Pharmacy & Pharmacognosy Research Indonesia
Cardiovascular & Hematological Agents in Medicinal Chemistry United States
Current Research in Biotechnology India
Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology United States
World Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine relative to Yaoxue xuebao China Yaoxue xuebao's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13.3×
Yaoxue xuebao · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in World Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in World Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in World Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites World Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine more than expected).

Fields of papers published in World Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in World Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in World Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine.

About World Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine

The 420 papers published in World Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine in the last decades have received a total of 2.3k indexed citations . Papers published in World Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine usually cover Complementary and alternative medicine (185 papers), Pharmacology (105 papers), Pharmacology (66 papers), Neurology (23 papers) and Molecular Biology (152 papers) specifically the topics of Traditional Chinese Medicine Analysis (69 papers), Traditional Chinese Medicine Studies (63 papers), Pharmacological Effects of Natural Compounds (54 papers), Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies (38 papers), Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (34 papers), Plant-based Medicinal Research (30 papers), Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (27 papers) and Ginseng Biological Effects and Applications (26 papers). The most active scholars publishing in World Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine are Shao Li, Thomas Efferth, Josef A. Brinckmann, Gerhard Franz, Mei Wang, Christian Bailly, De‐an Guo, Jiansheng Li, Kaixian Chen and Lei Liu.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact