International Ophthalmology Clinics

3.2k papers and 31.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.2k papers published in International Ophthalmology Clinics in the last decades have received a total of 31.4k indexed citations. Papers published in International Ophthalmology Clinics usually cover Ophthalmology (1.7k papers), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (892 papers) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (401 papers) specifically the topics of Glaucoma and retinal disorders (501 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (467 papers) and Corneal surgery and disorders (465 papers). The most active scholars publishing in International Ophthalmology Clinics are C. Stephen Foster, J Barraquer, K. C. Ossoinig, Juan Camilo Sánchez-Thorin, Lorenz E. Zimmerman, Michael A. Lemp, Peter A. D. Rubin, Allan J. Flach, David M. Maurice and Vincent P. deLuise.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in International Ophthalmology Clinics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in International Ophthalmology Clinics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in International Ophthalmology Clinics.

Countries where authors publish in International Ophthalmology Clinics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in International Ophthalmology Clinics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in International Ophthalmology Clinics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites International Ophthalmology Clinics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025