Biomedical Engineering Letters

9.0k citations
650 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

    • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
    • Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging
    • Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
    • Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
    • Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics

Papers in

    • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces 109
    • Neural dynamics and brain function 30
    • Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring 49
    • Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging 44
    • Muscle activation and electromyography studies 35

Biomedical Engineering Letters

584 papers receiving 8.7k citations

Peers

Biomedical Engineering Letters
Comparison fields: 5 of 196
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 1.8k
  • Biomedical Engineering 4.0k
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 1.7k
  • Neurology 443
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 751
Replace IRBM with:
IRBM France
Australasian Physical & Engineering Sciences in Medicine Australia
IEEE Journal of Translational Engineering in Health and Medicine United States
Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering United States
Medical Devices Evidence and Research United States
International Journal of Biomedical Imaging United States
Journal of Applied Biomedicine India
Current Opinion in Biomedical Engineering United States
IEEE Pulse United States
Topics in Magnetic Resonance Imaging United States
Biomedical Engineering Letters relative to IRBM France IRBM's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
IRBM · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Biomedical Engineering Letters

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Biomedical Engineering Letters. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Biomedical Engineering Letters with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Biomedical Engineering Letters more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Biomedical Engineering Letters

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Biomedical Engineering Letters. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Biomedical Engineering Letters.

About Biomedical Engineering Letters

The 650 papers published in Biomedical Engineering Letters in the last decades have received a total of 9.0k indexed citations . Papers published in Biomedical Engineering Letters usually cover Cognitive Neuroscience (141 papers), Biomedical Engineering (301 papers), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (121 papers), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (81 papers) and Rehabilitation (22 papers) specifically the topics of EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (109 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (73 papers), Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring (49 papers), Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging (44 papers), ECG Monitoring and Analysis (43 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (35 papers), Muscle activation and electromyography studies (35 papers) and Neural dynamics and brain function (30 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Biomedical Engineering Letters are Alexander J. Casson, Romany F. Mansour, T. Tamura, Chulhong Kim, Jae Sung Lee, Ram Bilas Pachori, Sang Ho Choi, Varun Bajaj, Jong-Mo Seo and Changkyun Im.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact