Zeitschrift für Kunstgeschichte

911 papers and 1.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 911 papers published in Zeitschrift für Kunstgeschichte in the last decades have received a total of 1.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Zeitschrift für Kunstgeschichte usually cover History (380 papers), Archeology (287 papers) and Classics (232 papers) specifically the topics of Medieval European History and Architecture (198 papers), Historical and Religious Studies of Rome (190 papers) and Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies (118 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Zeitschrift für Kunstgeschichte are Martin Kemp, James Elkins, Joseph Rykwert, Cosimo Bartoli, Helen Rosenau, Nikolaus Pevsner, Hans Belting, Kenneth John Conant, Otto H. Schmitt and H. W. Janson.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Zeitschrift für Kunstgeschichte

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Zeitschrift für Kunstgeschichte. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Zeitschrift für Kunstgeschichte.

Countries where authors publish in Zeitschrift für Kunstgeschichte

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Zeitschrift für Kunstgeschichte. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Zeitschrift für Kunstgeschichte with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Zeitschrift für Kunstgeschichte more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025