X-Ray Spectrometry

2.8k papers and 33.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.8k papers published in X-Ray Spectrometry in the last decades have received a total of 33.1k indexed citations. Papers published in X-Ray Spectrometry usually cover Radiation (2.0k papers), Materials Chemistry (734 papers) and Surfaces, Coatings and Films (659 papers) specifically the topics of X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis (1.9k papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (657 papers) and Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques (657 papers). The most active scholars publishing in X-Ray Spectrometry are Takashi Yamamoto, P. Wobrauschek, Peter J. Statham, Richard M. Rousseau, M. Saitta, Koen Janssens, Livia Leoni, P. Van Espen, R. Tertian and Manfred Schreiner.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in X-Ray Spectrometry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in X-Ray Spectrometry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in X-Ray Spectrometry.

Countries where authors publish in X-Ray Spectrometry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in X-Ray Spectrometry. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in X-Ray Spectrometry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites X-Ray Spectrometry more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025