Columbia Law Review

2.1k papers and 26.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.1k papers published in Columbia Law Review in the last decades have received a total of 26.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Columbia Law Review usually cover Political Science and International Relations (734 papers), Law (561 papers) and Economics and Econometrics (402 papers) specifically the topics of Legal Systems and Judicial Processes (324 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (172 papers) and Legal and Constitutional Studies (171 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Columbia Law Review are John C. Coffee, Kimberlé W. Crenshaw, Cass R. Sunstein, Robert P. Merges, Richard Briffault, Roberta Romano, Richard R. Nelson, Gilbert Y. Steiner, Richard A. Cloward and Frances Fox Piven.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Columbia Law Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Columbia Law Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Columbia Law Review.

Countries where authors publish in Columbia Law Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Columbia Law Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Columbia Law Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Columbia Law Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025