Walt Whitman Quarterly Review

425 papers and 239 indexed citations
i
.

About

The 425 papers published in Walt Whitman Quarterly Review in the last decades have received a total of 239 indexed citations. Papers published in Walt Whitman Quarterly Review usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (293 papers), Anthropology (29 papers) and History (25 papers) specifically the topics of Poetry Analysis and Criticism (236 papers), Digital Humanities and Scholarship (39 papers) and American and British Literature Analysis (36 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Walt Whitman Quarterly Review are Ed Folsom, Cristanne Miller, Christine Stansell, M. Jimmie Killingsworth, Max Thomas, Paul Jones, Alan Trachtenberg, William White, Benjamin Lee and A. M. Golden.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Walt Whitman Quarterly Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Walt Whitman Quarterly Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Walt Whitman Quarterly Review.

Countries where authors publish in Walt Whitman Quarterly Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Walt Whitman Quarterly Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Walt Whitman Quarterly Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Walt Whitman Quarterly Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026