World Neurosurgery X

255 papers and 804 indexed citations i.

About

The 255 papers published in World Neurosurgery X in the last decades have received a total of 804 indexed citations. Papers published in World Neurosurgery X usually cover Neurology (119 papers), Surgery (103 papers) and Epidemiology (58 papers) specifically the topics of Meningioma and schwannoma management (46 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (43 papers) and Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications (37 papers). The most active scholars publishing in World Neurosurgery X are Mehmet Zileli, Juan C. Fernández-Miranda, Francesco Costa, Fang‐Cheng Yeh, Sandip S. Panesar, Joanna M. Zakrzewska, Richeal Ní Ríordáin, Sarah R. Baker, Maurizio Fornari and Venkat Iyer.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in World Neurosurgery X

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in World Neurosurgery X. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in World Neurosurgery X.

Countries where authors publish in World Neurosurgery X

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in World Neurosurgery X. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in World Neurosurgery X with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites World Neurosurgery X more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025