˜The œjournal of Korean studies

283 papers and 798 indexed citations i.

About

The 283 papers published in ˜The œjournal of Korean studies in the last decades have received a total of 798 indexed citations. Papers published in ˜The œjournal of Korean studies usually cover Cultural Studies (175 papers), Sociology and Political Science (171 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (25 papers) specifically the topics of Japanese History and Culture (156 papers), Asian Culture and Media Studies (113 papers) and Chinese history and philosophy (60 papers). The most active scholars publishing in ˜The œjournal of Korean studies are Jiyeon Kang, Nancy Abelmann, Hyaeweol Choi, Jesook Song, Carter J. Eckert, Frank Hoffmann, Jungsun Park, Paul Y. Chang, Bruce Cumings and Michael Robinson.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in ˜The œjournal of Korean studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in ˜The œjournal of Korean studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in ˜The œjournal of Korean studies.

Countries where authors publish in ˜The œjournal of Korean studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in ˜The œjournal of Korean studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in ˜The œjournal of Korean studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites ˜The œjournal of Korean studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025