Women & Therapy

1.2k papers and 12.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.2k papers published in Women & Therapy in the last decades have received a total of 12.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Women & Therapy usually cover Clinical Psychology (458 papers), Social Psychology (326 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (298 papers) specifically the topics of Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (162 papers), Counseling Practices and Supervision (146 papers) and Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (90 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Women & Therapy are Philomena Essed, Stephanie S. Covington, Laura S. Brown, Beverly Greene, Jean Baker Miller, Maria P. P. Root, Judith V. Jordan, NiCole T. Buchanan, Pauline Rose Clance and Barbara Bloom.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Women & Therapy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Women & Therapy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Women & Therapy.

Countries where authors publish in Women & Therapy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Women & Therapy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Women & Therapy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Women & Therapy more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025