Countries where authors publish in Women & Therapy
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Women & Therapy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Women & Therapy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Women & Therapy more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Women & Therapy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Women & Therapy.
About Women & Therapy
The 1.3k papers published in Women & Therapy in the last decades have received a total of 15.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Women & Therapy usually cover General Psychology (50 papers), Clinical Psychology (467 papers), Gender Studies (170 papers), Social Psychology (329 papers) and Health (103 papers) specifically the topics of Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (166 papers), Counseling Practices and Supervision (147 papers), Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (90 papers), Racial and Ethnic Identity Research (77 papers), Gender Roles and Identity Studies (71 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (68 papers), LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (65 papers) and Migration, Health and Trauma (64 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Women & Therapy are Philomena Essed, Stephanie S. Covington, Jean Baker Miller, Maria P. P. Root, Laura S. Brown, Judith V. Jordan, Beverly Greene, NiCole T. Buchanan, Pauline Rose Clance and Barbara Bloom.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.