Journal of Women & Aging

981 papers and 11.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 981 papers published in Journal of Women & Aging in the last decades have received a total of 11.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Women & Aging usually cover Sociology and Political Science (322 papers), General Health Professions (251 papers) and Demography (235 papers) specifically the topics of Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (214 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (197 papers) and Aging and Gerontology Research (116 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Women & Aging are Laura Hurd Clarke, Young‐Shin Lee, Karen A. Roberto, Linda Vinton, Sarah B. Laditka, Carol Jenkins, Virginia Richardson, Eileen J. Porter, James N. Laditka and Christine A. Price.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Women & Aging

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Women & Aging. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Women & Aging.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Women & Aging

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Women & Aging. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Women & Aging with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Women & Aging more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025