Quarterly Review of Film and Video

748 papers and 1.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 748 papers published in Quarterly Review of Film and Video in the last decades have received a total of 1.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Quarterly Review of Film and Video usually cover Economics and Econometrics (329 papers), Sociology and Political Science (202 papers) and Literature and Literary Theory (180 papers) specifically the topics of Cinema and Media Studies (327 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (73 papers) and South Asian Cinema and Culture (57 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Quarterly Review of Film and Video are Ella Shohat, Wheeler Winston Dixon, Christine Gledhill, Vivian Sobchack, Mary Ann Doane, Jane M. Gaines, Marcia Landy, Gwendolyn Audrey Foster, Martha M. Lauzen and David Sterritt.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Quarterly Review of Film and Video

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Quarterly Review of Film and Video. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Quarterly Review of Film and Video.

Countries where authors publish in Quarterly Review of Film and Video

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Quarterly Review of Film and Video. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Quarterly Review of Film and Video with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Quarterly Review of Film and Video more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025