Countries where authors publish in Water Resources
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Water Resources. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Water Resources with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Water Resources more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Water Resources. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Water Resources.
About Water Resources
The 2.1k papers published in Water Resources in the last decades have received a total of 11.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Water Resources usually cover Earth-Surface Processes (559 papers), Geology (424 papers), Oceanography (486 papers), Water Science and Technology (453 papers) and Environmental Chemistry (222 papers) specifically the topics of Aquatic and Environmental Studies (490 papers), Geological Studies and Exploration (417 papers), Marine and environmental studies (403 papers), Water Resources and Management (310 papers), Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies (262 papers), Climate change and permafrost (169 papers), Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena (120 papers) and Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics (116 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Water Resources are M. V. Mikhailova, V. N. Mikhailov, О. Н. Насонова, Е. М. Гусев, Т. И. Моисеенко, А. В. Леонов, Yu. G. Motovilov, Andrey Kalugin, Н. А. Гашкина and I. A. Nemirovskaya.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.