This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Vitis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Vitis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Vitis more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Vitis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Vitis.
About Vitis
The 1.5k papers published in Vitis in the last decades have received a total of 11.6k indexed citations . Papers published in Vitis usually cover Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (157 papers), Food Science (711 papers), Plant Science (1.3k papers), Horticulture (18 papers) and Endocrinology (88 papers) specifically the topics of Horticultural and Viticultural Research (1.1k papers), Fermentation and Sensory Analysis (701 papers), Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (270 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (210 papers), Wine Industry and Tourism (157 papers), Plant tissue culture and regeneration (113 papers), Plant Reproductive Biology (98 papers) and Plant and Fungal Interactions Research (88 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Vitis are H. Düring, Michael Maixner, Hanns‐Heinz Kassemeyer, ROBERT F. SIMPSON, Shreevatsa Kodur, W. Koblet, G�nter Staudt, H. P. Ruffner, Manna Crespan and Luigi Bavaresco.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.