Comparative Exercise Physiology

447 papers and 2.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 447 papers published in Comparative Exercise Physiology in the last decades have received a total of 2.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Comparative Exercise Physiology usually cover Equine (243 papers), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (235 papers) and Rehabilitation (127 papers) specifically the topics of Veterinary Equine Medical Research (243 papers), Sports Performance and Training (169 papers) and Exercise and Physiological Responses (125 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Comparative Exercise Physiology are David Marlin, Jonathan Sinclair, Hilary M. Clayton, Jane Williams, Jane Williams, Frank E. Marino, Carey A. Williams, Agneta Egenvall, Chris W. Rogers and Lars Roepstorff.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Comparative Exercise Physiology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Comparative Exercise Physiology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Comparative Exercise Physiology.

Countries where authors publish in Comparative Exercise Physiology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Comparative Exercise Physiology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Comparative Exercise Physiology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Comparative Exercise Physiology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025