Utilities Policy

1.7k papers and 26.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.7k papers published in Utilities Policy in the last decades have received a total of 26.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Utilities Policy usually cover Electrical and Electronic Engineering (605 papers), Economics and Econometrics (465 papers) and Strategy and Management (358 papers) specifically the topics of Electric Power System Optimization (387 papers), Smart Grid Energy Management (296 papers) and Water resources management and optimization (219 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Utilities Policy are Mehdi Abid, Paul L. Joskow, Michael G. Pollitt, Rui Cunha Marques, Tooraj Jamasb, Laurens J. de Vries, Jon Stern, Malcolm Abbott, David Newbery and Benjamin K. Sovacool.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Utilities Policy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Utilities Policy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Utilities Policy.

Countries where authors publish in Utilities Policy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Utilities Policy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Utilities Policy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Utilities Policy more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025