Ultimate Reality and Meaning

229 papers and 249 indexed citations i.

About

The 229 papers published in Ultimate Reality and Meaning in the last decades have received a total of 249 indexed citations. Papers published in Ultimate Reality and Meaning usually cover Philosophy (47 papers), Sociology and Political Science (25 papers) and Religious studies (19 papers) specifically the topics of Theology and Philosophy of Evil (8 papers), African cultural and philosophical studies (8 papers) and Transformation of Global Christianity since 1945 (6 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Ultimate Reality and Meaning are Guido Peeters, Claus Emmeche, Michael O. Eze, Jonathan O. Chimakonam, James Maffie, Wim J. van der Steen, Ilkka Pyysiäinen, Anthony J. Blasi, Jack O. Waddell and Adam Liska.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Ultimate Reality and Meaning

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Ultimate Reality and Meaning. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Ultimate Reality and Meaning.

Countries where authors publish in Ultimate Reality and Meaning

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Ultimate Reality and Meaning. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Ultimate Reality and Meaning with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ultimate Reality and Meaning more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025