Castilla Estudios de Literatura

259 papers and 146 indexed citations i.

About

The 259 papers published in Castilla Estudios de Literatura in the last decades have received a total of 146 indexed citations. Papers published in Castilla Estudios de Literatura usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (179 papers), History (46 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (44 papers) specifically the topics of Comparative Literary Analysis and Criticism (82 papers), Spanish Literature and Culture Studies (75 papers) and Early Modern Spanish Literature (59 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Castilla Estudios de Literatura are Francisco Rico, Kenneth Brown, José Luis Bernal Salgado, Antonio Cortijo Ocaña, Luis de la Fuente, Emilio Alarcos Llorach, Anthony Close, José Antonio, José David and María del Pilar.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Castilla Estudios de Literatura

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Castilla Estudios de Literatura. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Castilla Estudios de Literatura.

Countries where authors publish in Castilla Estudios de Literatura

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Castilla Estudios de Literatura. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Castilla Estudios de Literatura with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Castilla Estudios de Literatura more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025