Tydskrif vir Geesteswetenskappe

800 papers and 1.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 800 papers published in Tydskrif vir Geesteswetenskappe in the last decades have received a total of 1.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Tydskrif vir Geesteswetenskappe usually cover Language and Linguistics (176 papers), Education (163 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (153 papers) specifically the topics of Legal Issues in South Africa (136 papers), Lexicography and Language Studies (94 papers) and linguistics and terminology studies (58 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Tydskrif vir Geesteswetenskappe are Rufus H. Gouws, Bert Olivier, Sven Tarp, Charlene du Toit-Brits, J.L. Van der Walt, Wessel Pienaar, Charl C. Wolhuter, Theodorus du Plessis, Jacobus A. Naudé and Ewert P.J. Kleynhans.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Tydskrif vir Geesteswetenskappe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Tydskrif vir Geesteswetenskappe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Tydskrif vir Geesteswetenskappe.

Countries where authors publish in Tydskrif vir Geesteswetenskappe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Tydskrif vir Geesteswetenskappe. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Tydskrif vir Geesteswetenskappe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tydskrif vir Geesteswetenskappe more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025