Travaux de linguistique

282 papers and 783 indexed citations i.

About

The 282 papers published in Travaux de linguistique in the last decades have received a total of 783 indexed citations. Papers published in Travaux de linguistique usually cover Philosophy (250 papers), Language and Linguistics (195 papers) and Linguistics and Language (92 papers) specifically the topics of Discourse Analysis and Argumentation Studies (248 papers), Historical Linguistics and Language Studies (140 papers) and French Language Learning Methods (79 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Travaux de linguistique are Michel Charolles, Piet Mertens, Catherine Schnedecker, Alain Rabatel, Georges Kleiber, Aidan Coveney, Laurence Rosier, Michel Pierrard, Sophie Prévost and Karen Lahousse.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Travaux de linguistique

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Travaux de linguistique. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Travaux de linguistique.

Countries where authors publish in Travaux de linguistique

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Travaux de linguistique. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Travaux de linguistique with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Travaux de linguistique more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025