Revue archéologique de Picardie

462 papers and 937 indexed citations i.

About

The 462 papers published in Revue archéologique de Picardie in the last decades have received a total of 937 indexed citations. Papers published in Revue archéologique de Picardie usually cover Archeology (136 papers), Anthropology (72 papers) and Paleontology (60 papers) specifically the topics of Ancient and Medieval Archaeology Studies (81 papers), Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (60 papers) and Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History (48 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Revue archéologique de Picardie are Patrice Méniel, Alain Tuffreau, Sébastien Lepetz, Mark B. Roberts, Christopher A. Bergman, Pierre Antoine, C.C. Bakels, Françoise Bouchet, Bernard Vincent and Patrick Auguste.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Revue archéologique de Picardie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Revue archéologique de Picardie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Revue archéologique de Picardie.

Countries where authors publish in Revue archéologique de Picardie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Revue archéologique de Picardie. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Revue archéologique de Picardie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Revue archéologique de Picardie more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025