ACM Transactions on Storage

423 papers and 6.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 423 papers published in ACM Transactions on Storage in the last decades have received a total of 6.2k indexed citations. Papers published in ACM Transactions on Storage usually cover Computer Networks and Communications (405 papers), Information Systems (144 papers) and Hardware and Architecture (143 papers) specifically the topics of Advanced Data Storage Technologies (390 papers), Caching and Content Delivery (225 papers) and Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques (142 papers). The most active scholars publishing in ACM Transactions on Storage are William J. Bolosky, Antony Rowstron, Austin Donnelly, Dushyanth Narayanan, Dutch T. Meyer, Ohad Rodeh, Remzi H. Arpaci-Dusseau, Andrea C. Arpaci-Dusseau, Tei‐Wei Kuo and Gene Tsudik.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in ACM Transactions on Storage

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in ACM Transactions on Storage. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in ACM Transactions on Storage.

Countries where authors publish in ACM Transactions on Storage

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in ACM Transactions on Storage. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in ACM Transactions on Storage with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites ACM Transactions on Storage more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025