ACM Transactions on Reconfigurable Technology and Systems
496 papers
receiving
7.2k citations
Peers
ACM Transactions on Reconfigurable Technology and Systems
Comparison fields: 5 of 135
Hardware and Architecture4.4k
Computer Networks and Communications2.1k
Electrical and Electronic Engineering3.4k
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition1.2k
Artificial Intelligence1.7k
Replace IEEE Design and Test with:
IEEE Design and TestUnited States
IEEE Embedded Systems LettersUnited States
ACM Journal on Emerging Technologies in Computing SystemsUnited States
IEEE Computer Architecture LettersUnited States
IET Computers & Digital TechniquesUnited States
VLSI designUnited States
EURASIP Journal on Embedded SystemsFrance
IEEE Circuits and Systems MagazineUnited States
Design Automation for Embedded SystemsUnited States
IACR Transactions on Cryptographic Hardware and Embedded SystemsGermany
ACM Transactions on Reconfigurable Technology and Systemsrelative toIEEE Design and TestUnited StatesIEEE Design and Test's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
IEEE Design and Test · 1×
×1.34k/3kHA
×1.32k/2kCNC
×0.73k/5kEEE
×2.01k/588CVPR
×1.12k/2kAI
Citations per year
'16
'17
'18
'19
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24
'25
'26
Countries where authors publish in ACM Transactions on Reconfigurable Technology and Systems
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in ACM Transactions on Reconfigurable Technology and Systems. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in ACM Transactions on Reconfigurable Technology and Systems with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites ACM Transactions on Reconfigurable Technology and Systems more than expected).
Fields of papers published in ACM Transactions on Reconfigurable Technology and Systems
This network shows the impact of papers published in ACM Transactions on Reconfigurable Technology and Systems. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in ACM Transactions on Reconfigurable Technology and Systems.
About ACM Transactions on Reconfigurable Technology and Systems
The 548 papers published in ACM Transactions on Reconfigurable Technology and Systems in the last decades have received a total of 7.4k indexed citations . Papers published in ACM Transactions on Reconfigurable Technology and Systems usually cover Hardware and Architecture (361 papers), Computer Networks and Communications (194 papers), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (92 papers), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (239 papers) and Artificial Intelligence (126 papers) specifically the topics of Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques (189 papers), Embedded Systems Design Techniques (187 papers), Interconnection Networks and Systems (131 papers), VLSI and Analog Circuit Testing (83 papers), VLSI and FPGA Design Techniques (82 papers), Low-power high-performance VLSI design (75 papers), Physical Unclonable Functions (PUFs) and Hardware Security (46 papers) and Cryptographic Implementations and Security (45 papers). The most active scholars publishing in ACM Transactions on Reconfigurable Technology and Systems are Vaughn Betz, Martin Herbordt, Miriam E. Leeser, Kees Vissers, Farinaz Koushanfar, Jason Luu, Miodrag Potkonjak, Mehrdad Majzoobi, Alan D. George and Michaela Blott.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.