ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction

5.8k citations
385 papers · · active since 2018

Impact in

Papers in

ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction

324 papers receiving 5.6k citations

Peers

ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction
Comparison fields: 5 of 139
  • Social Psychology 3.0k
  • Human-Computer Interaction 821
  • Safety Research 489
  • Artificial Intelligence 1.9k
  • Control and Systems Engineering 962
Replace Interaction Studies Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems with:
Interaction Studies Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems United States
Paladyn Journal of Behavioral Robotics United Kingdom
Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making United States
Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces France
ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems United States
International Journal of Aviation Psychology United States
Ergonomics in Design The Quarterly of Human Factors Applications United States
Cognitive Research Principles and Implications United States
Advances in Human-Computer Interaction United States
ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems United States
ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction relative to Interaction Studies Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems United States Interaction Studies Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.9×
Interaction Studies Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction more than expected).

Fields of papers published in ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction.

About ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction

The 385 papers published in ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction in the last decades have received a total of 5.8k indexed citations . Papers published in ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction usually cover Social Psychology (263 papers), Human-Computer Interaction (65 papers), Safety Research (40 papers), Artificial Intelligence (134 papers) and Cognitive Neuroscience (68 papers) specifically the topics of Social Robot Interaction and HRI (195 papers), Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (83 papers), AI in Service Interactions (81 papers), Robot Manipulation and Learning (51 papers), Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (40 papers), Reinforcement Learning in Robotics (36 papers), Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology (25 papers) and Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (24 papers). The most active scholars publishing in ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction are Natasha Randall, Malte Friedrich Jung, PAMELA J. HINDS, Guy Hoffman, Laurel D. Riek, Kerstin Dautenhahn, Hee Rin Lee, Dana Kulić, Brenna Argall and Xuan Zhao.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact