ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems

12.6k citations
367 papers · · active since 2016

Impact in

Papers in

ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems

349 papers receiving 12.1k citations

Peers

ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems
Comparison fields: 5 of 174
  • Human-Computer Interaction 1.7k
  • Health Informatics 377
  • Artificial Intelligence 5.3k
  • Information Systems 3.3k
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2.7k
Replace User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction with:
User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction United States
Computer Science Review India
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery United States
˜The œPsychology of learning and motivation United States
IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine China
ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems United States
Big Data United States
Smart Learning Environments United States
Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies United States
Information Technology & Tourism United States
ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems relative to User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction United States User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.3×
User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems more than expected).

Fields of papers published in ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems.

About ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems

The 367 papers published in ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems in the last decades have received a total of 12.6k indexed citations . Papers published in ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems usually cover Human-Computer Interaction (69 papers), Health Informatics (12 papers), Computer Science Applications (33 papers), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (118 papers) and Artificial Intelligence (165 papers) specifically the topics of Data Visualization and Analytics (55 papers), Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) (43 papers), Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (37 papers), Recommender Systems and Techniques (33 papers), Social Robot Interaction and HRI (32 papers), Topic Modeling (26 papers), Speech and dialogue systems (25 papers) and Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology (25 papers). The most active scholars publishing in ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems are F. Maxwell Harper, Joseph A. Konstan, Ben Shneiderman, Marius Kaminskas, Derek Bridge, Sidney K. D’Mello, Art C. Graesser, Per Ola Kristensson, John J. Dudley and Bart P. Knijnenburg.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact