Theory and Practice of Logic Programming

773 papers and 6.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 773 papers published in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming in the last decades have received a total of 6.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming usually cover Artificial Intelligence (717 papers), Computational Theory and Mathematics (248 papers) and Computer Networks and Communications (148 papers) specifically the topics of Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (576 papers), Logic, programming, and type systems (378 papers) and Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation (275 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming are Yde Venema, Torsten Schaub, Guillermo Ricardo Simari, Alejandro Javier García, Vladimir Lifschitz, Martin Gebser, Maurice Bruynooghe, Michael Gelfond, Francesco Ricca and Hudson Turner.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming.

Countries where authors publish in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Theory and Practice of Logic Programming more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025