Library Leadership & Management

200 papers and 498 indexed citations i.

About

The 200 papers published in Library Leadership & Management in the last decades have received a total of 498 indexed citations. Papers published in Library Leadership & Management usually cover Library and Information Sciences (102 papers), Information Systems (41 papers) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (28 papers) specifically the topics of Library Science and Information Literacy (92 papers), Library Science and Administration (36 papers) and Web and Library Services (31 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Library Leadership & Management are Anne Casey, Jody Condit Fagan, Jennifer L. Bartlett, Ken Haycock, Joseph R. Matthews, Kevin Harwell, David W. Lewis, Christopher Stewart, Jason Martin and Peter Hernon.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Library Leadership & Management

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Library Leadership & Management. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Library Leadership & Management.

Countries where authors publish in Library Leadership & Management

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Library Leadership & Management. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Library Leadership & Management with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Library Leadership & Management more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025