The Keio Journal of Medicine

1.2k papers and 13.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.2k papers published in The Keio Journal of Medicine in the last decades have received a total of 13.3k indexed citations. Papers published in The Keio Journal of Medicine usually cover Surgery (215 papers), Molecular Biology (200 papers) and Epidemiology (126 papers) specifically the topics of Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (34 papers), Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies (25 papers) and Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (23 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Keio Journal of Medicine are Takeshi Miyamoto, Kenzaburô Tsuchiya, Takashi Hayashi, Thomas Schwarz, Shosuke Okamoto, Louis Sokoloff, Yoshiaki Kubota, Jeffrey M. Friedman, U Okamoto and Zeni Alfonso.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The Keio Journal of Medicine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Keio Journal of Medicine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Keio Journal of Medicine.

Countries where authors publish in The Keio Journal of Medicine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Keio Journal of Medicine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Keio Journal of Medicine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Keio Journal of Medicine more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025